Legal Opinion

McCulloch Gas Processing Corp. v. Canadian Hidrogas Resources, Ltd.

Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals

Decided May 9, 1978No. 9-39PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MILLER, Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (“board”), 193 USPQ 238 (1976), granting summary judgment to applicant-appellee Litronix, Inc. (“Litronix”) and dismissing the opposition by opposer-appellant Litton Industries, Inc. (“Litton”). In reaching its decision, the board applied the doctrine of collateral estoppel on the basis of previous litigation between the parties.1 We reverse and remand.

Background

In 1971 Litronix filed an application to register the mark LITRONIX for “optoelectronic semiconductor devices,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Campana Corporation v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1943
  2. Toro Co. v. Hardigg Industries, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
  3. Gary D. Jackson v. P. J. GriffithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
  4. Myrurgia, S. A. v. Comptoir De La Parfumerie, S. A. Ancienne Maison TschanzCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  5. Aloe Creme Laboratories, Inc. v. Aloe 99, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Dyke v. Gulf Oil Corp.Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. STATE OF MINN. BY HUMPHREY v. Standard Oil Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1983
  3. Florida Power & Light Co. v. Belcher Oil Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1979
  4. Wesreco, Inc. v. United States Department of the InteriorDistrict Court, D. Utah · 1985
  5. Boyce v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API