Legal Opinion

Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual Insurance

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 30, 1994No. 1—92—3773PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Greiman

In this declaratory judgment action seeking a determination of the right to insurance coverage for environmental damage, plaintiff Lapham-Hickey Steel Corporation appeals the trial court’s order which (1) granted summary judgment in favor of defendant Protection Mutual Insurance Company, finding that a provision in the policy requiring the filing of suit within 12 months of discovery was dispositive; and (2) denied partial summary judgment against plaintiff to defendant’s duty to defend under the policy.

On appeal plaintiff raises two issues: (1) whether the 12-month suit limitation clause in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Outboard Marine Corp. v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Wilkin Insulation Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Maury A. Ryan, D/B/A Ryan, Klimek, Ryan Partnership v. Royal Insurance Company of America, Etc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Specialty Coatings Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  5. Demos v. National Bank of GreeceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. Protection Mutual InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Lapham-Hickey Steel Corp. v. National Surety Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  3. Tricentennial Eagle Limited Partnership v. Bankers Standard InsuranceMassachusetts Superior Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API