Fusting v. Sullivan
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Circuit Court of Baltimore City. The case is stated in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.
John C. Sullivan, in 1871, instituted an action of assumpsit against Joseph P. Fusting; pending the suit the defendant died, and his executors were made parties, and judgment was recovered against them for $1524.18. This judgment, upon an appeal taken by the defendants was affirmed in this Court on the 2nd day of December 1874, (41 Md., 162.). On the 3rd day of December 1874, the judgment was assigned by Sullivan, the plaintiff, to James McDougall for valuable consideration. This assignment was made in pursuance of a previous agreement, and was evidenced by an order of that date directing the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mead v. Merritt & PeckNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
- Marshall v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Fusting v. SullivanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1874
- Levy v. SteinbachCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875
- Smith v. Washington Gaslight Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1869
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Imbesi v. Carpenter Realty Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- Maryland Cooperative Milk Producers, Inc. v. BellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1964
- Schenuit v. International Finance Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
- Imbesi v. Carpenter Realty Corp.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1999