Legal Opinion

FWK Holdings LLC v. Shire PLC (Direct Purchaser Antitrust Class Action Complaint)

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided February 11, 2021No. 1:16-cv-12653Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * * In re INTUNIV ANTITRUST LITIGATION * Civil Action No. 1:16-cv-12653-ADB (Direct Purchasers) * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. This “pay-for-delay” or “reverse settlement” case arises from an alleged anticompetitive agreement between the brand and generic manufacturers of Intuniv, an ADHD medication. Defendants Shire LLC and Shire U.S., Inc. (collectively, “Shire”) manufacture Intuniv, which is the brand-name for extended release guanfacine hydrochloride. Defendants Actavis Elizabeth LLC, Actavis Holdco US, Inc., and Actavis…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Henry Schein, Inc. v. Archer & White Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2019
  5. Carey Brennan v. Opus BankCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API