Legal Opinion

Williams Natural Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided May 14, 1996No. 75,730PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lewis, J.:

In March 1994, Kansas Pipeline Partnership (KPP) and Kansas Natural Partnership (KNP), collectively the Joint Applicants, filed an application before the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) for a rate increase. There were several intervenors in the rate case at the KCC level. The. only intervenor who remains a party on appeal is Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG). For that reason, we need not identify the other intervenors. KPP and KNP merged as a result of the KCC hearings and no longer have separate identities. However, we will still refer to them as Joint Applicants or by their…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Public Employee Relations Board of the Kansas Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
  2. Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. State Corporation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  3. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
  4. Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Crawford v. Kansas Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. CITIZENS'UTILITY RATEPAYER BD. v. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  2. Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board v. State Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
  3. Kansas Pipeline Partnership v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
  4. Western Resources, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
  5. Kansas Industrial Consumers v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API