Williams Natural Gas Co. v. State Corporation Commission
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Lewis, J.:
In March 1994, Kansas Pipeline Partnership (KPP) and Kansas Natural Partnership (KNP), collectively the Joint Applicants, filed an application before the Kansas Corporation Commission (KCC) for a rate increase. There were several intervenors in the rate case at the KCC level. The. only intervenor who remains a party on appeal is Williams Natural Gas Company (WNG). For that reason, we need not identify the other intervenors. KPP and KNP merged as a result of the KCC hearings and no longer have separate identities. However, we will still refer to them as Joint Applicants or by their…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State, Department of Social & Rehabilitation Services v. Public Employee Relations Board of the Kansas Department of Human ResourcesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1991
- Midwest Gas Users Ass'n v. State Corporation CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1986
- Kansas Gas & Electric Co. v. State Corporation Comm.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Crawford v. Kansas Dept. of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- CITIZENS'UTILITY RATEPAYER BD. v. State Corporation Comm'nSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
- Citizens' Utility Ratepayer Board v. State Corp. CommissionCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- Kansas Pipeline Partnership v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1997
- Western Resources, Inc. v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
- Kansas Industrial Consumers v. Kansas Corporation Comm'nCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.