Legal Opinion

Passumpsic Bank v. Strong

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided November 15, 1869PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Bill in Chancery. The orators brought a suit against George W. Strong in 1864, and recovered judgment therein in 1858, and caused execution to be levied on certain real estate in Rut-land, -which had been attached when said suit was instituted. Previous to this suit and attachment, said George W. had conveyed by deed of trust said real estate to the defendant, Moses M. Strong- and said Moses M. subsequently sold and conveyed the same to the defendant Ellsworth.

Read the full summary

Bill in Chancery. The orators brought a suit against George W. Strong in 1864, and recovered judgment therein in 1858, and caused execution to be levied on certain real estate in Rut-land, -which had been attached when said suit was instituted. Previous to this suit and attachment, said George W. had conveyed by deed of trust said real estate to the defendant, Moses M. Strong- and said Moses M. subsequently sold and conveyed the same to the defendant Ellsworth. This bill, dated April 11,1860, was brought to have said deeds declared void, and the defendants decreed to convey said premises to…

1Opinion of the Court

Argued and determined at the general term, 1865.

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Barrett, J.

The orator Bank brought a suit against George W. Strong of Rutland, and, on the 21st day of July, 1854, attached all his real estate in said Rutland. Judgment was recovered by the plaintiff in said suit, at the March term, 1858, of Rutland County Court, for $2450.75 damages, and $81.65 costs. Said property was the subject of prior attachments, so that, on the 22d of February, 1859, and within five months after said prior attachments had been discharged, the orator levied, by execution on said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mussey v. NoyesSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854
  2. Farr v. BrackettSupreme Court of Vermont · 1857
  3. Stanley v. RobbinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1863
  4. M. Noyes & Co. v. HickokSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. West-Nesbitt, Inc. v. Ralston Purina CompanySupreme Court of Vermont · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API