Legal Opinion

West-Nesbitt, Inc. v. Ralston Purina Company

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 2, 1970No. 66-69PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolden, C.J.

This action is in equity and was instituted by the plaintiff to obtain declaratory relief and the dissolution of an attachment levied by the defendant on a farm formerly owned by Glendon and Shirley Randall in the town of Marsh- field, Vermont. The chancellor’s findings and declaratory decree are based on an agreed statement of facts which was enlarged by oral and documentary evidence.

The core of the controversy is a stipulation entered by the plaintiff and the Randalls on May 7, 1968 to accomplish the settlement and discontinuance of an action at law brought by the plaintiff in the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Shea v. PiletteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1937
  2. Estate of TaggartCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Anderson v. YaworskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Jennisons v. LeonardSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  5. Modern Woodmen of America v. HeadleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1914

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Willard Pease Oil & Gas Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Langevin v. Hillsborough CountySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  3. Hemingway v. ShatneySupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  4. Hunn v. KoerberSupreme Court of Vermont · 1971
  5. Willard Pease Oil & Gas Co. v. Pioneer Oil & Gas Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API