Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rixson Merle Perry v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided January 23, 1986No. 82-1136Published

1DissentCummings, Chief Judge

There is little to add to the majority panel opinion in Perry I, 759 F.2d 1271 (7th Cir.1985), to illustrate why I am compelled to dissent. That opinion was based principally on this Court’s majority opinion in Larry v. Lawler, 605 F.2d 954 (7th Cir.1978). Perry I is also in accord with Owen v. City of Independence, 445 U.S. 622, 633-34, 100 S.Ct. 1398, 1406-07, 63 L.Ed.2d 673, which held that dismissal of a government employee because of an allegedly false statement against him deprived the employee of a protected liberty interest without due process of law. While the en banc majority…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Owen v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
  3. Milo John Munson v. Wendell R. Friske, John Rybak, Jr., Kenneth Todd, and Ashland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  4. Marie Ellsworth & Paul Ellsworth v. City of Racine, a Municipal CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  5. Richard C. Bartel v. Federal Aviation Administration Richard C. Bartel v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API