Legal Opinion

Gottlieb v. New York Life Insurance

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided March 13, 1930PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

The policy providing for disability compensation and waiver of premiums upon proof of total and permanent disability, or where such proof establishes “ that the insured is, and for a period of not less than three consecutive months immediately preceding receipt of proof has been totally disabled,” it was not a compliance with the contract to offer proof of disability one year after the disability had ceased, and plaintiff’s ignorance of the provision entitling him to compensation is no excuse for failure to comply with the terms of the contract. (Whiteside v. No. American Acc. Ins. Co., 200…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Whiteside v. North American Accident InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  2. Hanna v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  3. Hanna v. Commercial Travelers Mutual Accident Ass'n of AmericaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Dean v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Rose v. N.Y. Life Ins. Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Kasarsky v. New York Life InsuranceCity of New York Municipal Court · 1932
  4. Aufiero v. New York Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. Reed v. New York Life InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API