State ex rel. Madison v. Cotner
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
All respondents have filed motions to dismiss. After examination of these motions, we are of the opinion that they are without merit.
Respondent Cotner urges dismissal of relators’ complaint for failure to join as indispensable parties the city of Cleveland and the Attorney General of Ohio, pursuant to R. C. 2721.12. Examination of that statute reveals it applies to actions in which declaratory relief is sought. This is an original action in mandamus; therefore, that statute is inapplicable. Further, we find that all parties necessary for just adjudication are presently before this court. For…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State, Ex Rel. Millington v. WeirOhio Court of Appeals · 1978
- Dillon v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1927
- Billington v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1971
- State ex rel. Ohio National Bank v. LancioneOhio Supreme Court · 1978
- State ex rel. Perk v. CotnerOhio Supreme Court · 1973
3Cited by16 opinions
- Salemi v. Cleveland Metroparks (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2016
- State ex rel. Spirko v. Judges of the Court of AppealsOhio Supreme Court · 1986
- State ex rel. Blackman v. HitteOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- State of Ohio, Ex Rel. Clark v. Krichbaum, 07-Ma-66 (6-20-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Wright v. Application for Relief from DisabilityOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.