Yost v. Stout
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HOLMES, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Erick R. Yost appeals from the district court’s adverse judgment on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 challenge to the “endorsement clause” of the Kansas Code of Judicial Conduct that generally prohibits a judge or judicial candidate from publicly endorsing or opposing another candidate for public office. We sought additional briefing from the parties on whether the notice of appeal in this matter was timely filed. We conclude that it was not. Accordingly, we do not have jurisdiction over the merits of this appeal and dismiss it for lack of jurisdiction.
BACKGROUND
O…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- White v. New Hampshire Department of Employment SecuritySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Budinich v. Becton Dickinson & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Laville Hannon v. Herb Maschner and the Attorney General of the State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1992
- Michael Bates v. The Department of Corrections of the State of KansasCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
- Ramsey v. Colonial Life Insurance Co. of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Banister v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2020
- Nelson v. Board of County CommissionersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
- Husky Ventures, Inc. v. B55 Invs., Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2018
- Bunn v. PerdueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2020
- Essex Holding, LLC v. Basic Props., Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2018
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.