Legal Opinion

Price v. . Sykes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1820Published

1Opinion of the Court

The Court having thus intimated an opinion, Seawell contended that if complainant got a decree he could not recover costs. The defendants are heirs at law, having no knowledge of the facts upon which the equity of Sykes and Price rested, and some of them are infants, who are not to blame for the defense set up here or the claim asserted at law for them by their next friends. Infants never pay costs. 3 Atk., 223; 2 N.C. 371. Whether the complainant had a legal title to the land for which he was sued, it is unnecessary to decide, because he was unable to establish it upon the trial at law, in…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dew v. . PykeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
  2. Patterson v. Ramsey.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Morris v. . FordSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1833
  4. Vestal v. . SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  5. Pierce v. . WanettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1858

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API