People v. Sjosten
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtTaylor, J.
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of burglary (Pen. Code, §459). He contends that: his arrest was unlawful, certain evidence was improperly admitted, and he was not properly advised of his rights under the Fourth and Sixth Amendments of the Constitution of the United States. We have concluded that there is no merit in any of these contentions.
As no questions concerning the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the conviction are raised, a brief review of the pertinent facts will suffice. On Tuesday, December 20, 1966, just before…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- People v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- People v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Bielicki v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. BowmanIdaho Court of Appeals · 1993
- People v. ZelinskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hamburg v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2004
- People v. BevinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- State v. MooreIdaho Court of Appeals · 1996
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.