Legal Opinion
Transwestern Pipeline Co. v. 9.32 Acres, More or Less, of Permanent Easement Located in Maricopa County
District Court, D. Arizona
Decided April 17, 2008No. Nos. 2:07-cv-02287-JWS, 2:07-cv-2288-JWS, 2:07-cv-2292-JWS, 2:07-cv-2294-JWS, 2:07-cv-2301-JWS, 2:07-cv-2311-JWS, 2:07-cv-2312-JWS, 2:07-cv-2321-JWS to 2:07-cv-2325-JWS, 2:07-cv- 2346-JWS, 2:07-cv-2350-JWS, 2:07-cv-2357-JWS, 2:07-cv-2364-JWS, 2:07-cv-2365-JWS, 2:07-cv-2371-JWS, 2:07-cv-2374-JWS, 2:07-cv-2376-JWS, 2:07-cv-2377-JWS, 2:07-cv-2379-JWS, 2:07-cv-2380-JWS, 2:07-cv-2488-JWS, 2:07-cv-2540-JWS, 2:07-cv-2576-JWS, 2:07-cv-2591-JWS, 2:07-cv-2633-JWS, 2:08-cv-0003-JWS, 2:08-cv-0033-JWSPublished
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
JOHN W. SEDWICK, District Judge.
I. MOTIONS ADDRESSED
In each of the cases listed in the caption to this order there is pending either a motion styled “Transwestern Pipeline Company’s Renewed Motion for Preliminary Injunction Permitting Immediate Entry and Use of the Defendant Properties” or a motion styled “Plaintiffs Renewed Motion for Immediate Access and Possession.” The motions were fully briefed. A two and a half day evidentiary hearing concerning the motions was conducted in Phoenix beginning on April 8, 2008. Oral argument on the motions was heard on the afternoon of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Schneidewind v. ANR Pipeline Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- East Tennessee Natural Gas Co. v. SageCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2004
- Weiner v. Bank of King of PrussiaDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
- Southern Natural Gas Co. v. Land, Cullman CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.