Legal Opinion

Kernjack v. Joe Cotton Realty Corp.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 13, 1968No. 68-38PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANN, Judge.

Cotton’s counsel contends that his client has earned this commission twice. The Circuit Court concluded that he had earned it once. The countdown continues.

Kernjack told Cotton that he wanted to sell some acreage in Collier County at a certain price. Cotton promptly found a purchaser at Kernjack’s price, but the proposed contract provided for release of non-contiguous parcels for a specified higher sum per acre, the excess to be treated as a prepayment on the next accruing installments. So far, no earned' comission: the conditions as well as the price must be acceptable.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McAllister Hotel v. PorteSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  2. Mellet v. HenryDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1959
  3. Alex D. Smith Real Estate, Inc. v. Gables Venetian Waterways, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1957

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Fenton v. Bancroft Hotel Associates, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1972
  2. Sherman v. LynchDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
  3. Giles v. NewcombDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1974
  4. Langfitt v. Poitras, Circuit Court of the 19th Judicial Circuit of Florida, Indian River County1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API