Legal Opinion · Dissent

Laflin v. Drake

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 22, 1951No. 4-9299Published

1DissentEd F. McFaddin, Justice

Heretofore we have accorded some degree of finality to foreclosure proceedings in Improvement District cases; and we have also accorded some degree of finality to orders confirming the sales and approving the deeds in such cases. The holding in the present case does much to destroy all such ideas of finality.

A lengthy dissent might be written, discussing the line of demarcation between a collateral attack and a direct attack on a judgment, and also showing that the present suit is a collateral attack by all the tests stated in all the cases. A lengthy dissent might also he written listing our…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pinkert v. LambSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
  2. Stith v. PinkertSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
  3. Pinkston v. SchumanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API