Legal Opinion

Stith v. Pinkert

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 13, 1950No. 4-9297PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDunaway, J.

For the second time the question of appellee Pinkert’s title to the west % of lots 1 to 6 inclusive, block 8, Adams Addition to the City of Little Rock, Arkansas, is before this court. The first case was Pinkert v. Lamb, 215 Ark. 879, 224 S. W. 2d 15.

In the Lamb case, the litigation was between Ed Pinkert and Ella Stith, widow of J ames H. Stith. Pinkert claimed title through mesne conveyances from Sewer Improvement District No. 94 of Little Rock. The District had purchased the property at a commissioner’s sale held pursuant to a decree of the Pulaski Chancery Court rendered November 23,…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Ballard v. HunterSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  2. Cassady v. NorrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  3. Duggan v. OgdenMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Ballard v. HunterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1905
  5. Foster v. GravesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Fayetteville v. BibbCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1989
  2. Laflin v. DrakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951
  3. Long Prairie Levee District v. WallSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1957
  4. Laflin v. DrakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API