Saint-Gobain Ceramics & Plastics, Inc. v. Ii-Vi Inc.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
IV. DISCUSSION
The sole question before the Court is whether, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1498, the Court should dismiss this case. Section 1498 is an affirmative defense, not a jurisdictional bar. Manville Sales Corp. v. Paramount Sys., Inc., 917 F.2d 544, 554 (Fed. Cir. 1990). Section 1498"relieves a third party from patent infringement liability, and it acts as a waiver of sovereign immunity and consent to liability by the United States." Madey v. Duke Univ., 307 F.3d 1351, 1359 (Fed. Cir. 2002). A section 1498 affirmative defense is a highly factual determination, whereby a defendant must…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- South Corporation and Seal Fleet, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1982
- Manville Sales Corporation, Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Paramount Systems, Inc., Robert S. Butterworth and Anthony J. DisimoneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1990
- Richmond Screw Anchor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Hughes Aircraft Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1976
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Arbutus Biopharma Corporation v. Moderna, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2022
- Wilson Aerospace LLC v. The Boeing Company IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2025