Legal Opinion
State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming Devices
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
Decided May 8, 1984No. 934, September Term, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GILBERT, Chief Judge.
If gaming is a spice of life, the spices in the instant case have been dished up to us in one hundred and fifty-eight assorted flavors.
This appeal arises from a petition by the State for the forfeiture of gaming devices seized from Willow Enterprises, Inc., a Maryland corporation (Willow).
Prior to the trial on the petition, Willow moved for summary judgment in its favor on the ground there was neither statutory nor common law authority for the forfeiture. Willow’s motion was denied.
After the matter was heard in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County on the merits, the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lion Manufacturing Corporation (New Lion) v. Robert F. Kennedy, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
- Prince George's County v. Blue Bird Cab Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
- Director of Fin., Pr. Geo's Co. v. ColeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
- Clerk of Circuit Court v. Chesapeake Beach Park, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1969
- Bozman v. Office of Fin., Balto. Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Prince George's County v. VieiraCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- State v. One Hundred & Fifty-Eight Gaming DevicesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Allen v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Mercantile-Safe Deposit & Trust Co. v. HearnCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1985
- Mayor of Baltimore v. One 1995 Corvette Vin No. 1G1YY22P585103433Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1998
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.