Legal Opinion

Ransom v. Lochmiller

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided April 2, 1929No. 38184PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.

— The stated consideration in the bill of sale is' one dollar, and that in the deed is shown by the evidence to have been nominal. Tbongb not so stated in the abstract, it is stated in the court’s findings, asserted by plaintiff, and not denied by defendants,' to have been ‘ ‘ one- dollar and love and affection. ’ ’ These instruments, executed by two of the defendants and accepted by the other, are an admission by all of them, and primafacie evidence, that the consideration for the alleged transfers other than that of love and affection'was nominal. The evidence is that the real property…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank of Iowa City v. HartsockSupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  2. Dimick v. MunsingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1929
  3. Coburn v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Pike v. CoonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934
  2. Williams Savings Bank v. MurphySupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  3. Commercial Savings Bank v. BalderstonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1935
  4. First National Bank v. MurthaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931
  5. Lietz v. GriemeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API