Legal Opinion

First National Bank of Iowa City v. Hartsock

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided November 16, 1926PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MorliNG, j.

The case presents only a fact question. The burden of proof is upon the plaintiffs. Fraud is not presumed. The relationship of pare'nts and child between the grantors and the grantee -does not create a presumption of fraud. It does- require a critical examination of the attending circumstances. Fraud is not committed openly. It is an offense of secrecy. Direct evidence is rarely obtainable. Frequently it can be shown only by the circumstances admitted by the parties .to it. Fraud may, and usually must, be proved by circumstantial evidence. The individual circumstances are usually…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. McGruderSupreme Court of Virginia · 1891

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Northrup v. Miles Homes, Inc. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1973
  2. Rouse v. RouseSupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
  3. Hatheway v. HansonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  4. Clark v. ClarkSupreme Court of Iowa · 1930
  5. Central National Bank & Trust Co. of Des Moines v. WagenerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1971

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API