Legal Opinion

United States of America and Jimmy Chan, Revenue Agent v. Cheng C. Kao and Susan L. Kao, United States of America v. Chin Wu and Su-Chin Kao

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 11, 1996No. 94-15569, 94-15570PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILVER, District Judge:

The Kaos are taxpayers who are being civilly investigated by the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”). They appeal a consolidated district court order enforcing four summons served by the IRS and compelling the Kaos to execute consent directives. We conclude that 26 U.S.C. § 7602 does not authorize the IRS to compel taxpayers to sign consent directives which would enable the IRS to obtain records from third parties through means other than those established in 26 U.S.C. § 7609. Therefore, we reverse the district court’s order.

In December, 1991, agent Jimmy Chan began…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver for Central Savings and Loan Association v. Daniel T. McSweeney Frederick C. StalderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  2. Boise Cascade Corporation Pope & Talbot, Inc. James River Ii, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Northwest Coalition for Alternatives to Pesticides (Ncap) v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Citizens for a Better Environment v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, the Santa Clara Valley Nonpoint Source Dischargers, Respondent-Intervenor. Northwest Coalition for Alternatives v. United States Environmental Protection AgencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  3. United States of America and Joseph R. Rouleau, Special Agent of the Internal Revenue Service v. Gideon Goldman, Certified Public AccountantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Peggy J. Neece Buel H. Neece v. Internal Revenue Service of the United States of America United States of America First National Bank of Turley, N.A.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  5. United States v. Mobil Corp.District Court, N.D. Texas · 1981

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rigby v. Mastro (In Re Mastro)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  2. United States v. U.S. BancorpDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1998
  3. Reimer v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API