United States v. U.S. Bancorp
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
DOTY, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the objections of respondent U.S. Bancorp to the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge John M. Mason dated February 10, 1998. 1 In his report, the magistrate judge recommended that: (1) the petition of the government for enforcement of the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) summonses be granted except to the extent that the summonses seek the creation of new documents or materials not yet in existence; (2) respondent’s “Motion for Discovery, Evi-dentiary Hearing and Partial Sealing of the Record” (Docket No. 15)…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. Arthur Young & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Alvin Frazin, United States of America v. Ronald Mark MillerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States of America and Dennis J. Hanzel, Special Agent, Internal Revenue Service v. Jay T. WillCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Thurman S. Alphin, and Mary L. Alphin Alphin Aircraft Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Xĕlan, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005
- (SS) Usanovic v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023
- Xelan, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2005