Legal Opinion

R. Krevolin & Co., Inc. v. Tharp

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided July 21, 1955No. Appeal, 52PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Ervin, J.,

This is an appeal from the refusal of the court below to strike off a judgment entered by the prothonotary on an instrument containing a warrant of attorney to confess judgment.

Judgment was entered against defendants in the amount of $4,950.00 on April 8, 1954, pursuant to a warrant of attorney contained in a judgment note. The judgment note contains an unconditional promise to pay to the order of plaintiff the sum of $4,950.00. It authorizes the prothonotary to enter judgment against defendants “for the above sum or at the option of said clerk, prothonotary or attorney…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Solazo v. BoyleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  3. Meyers & Joly v. FreilingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  4. Noonan, Inc. v. HoffSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Dalton v. WillingmyreSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Philadelphia Gas Heating Co. v. SandersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  2. Cam Vending Service v. KesslerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1964
  3. Sterling Electrical & Furniture Co. v. MitchellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1955
  4. Approved Bancredit Corp. v. Moehlmann, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1967
  5. Lebanon Valley National Bank v. Henning, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lebanon County1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API