Legal Opinion

CAEZ v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided May 13, 2008No. AC 28277PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

2Per curiam

The petitioner, Israel Caez, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that his due process rights were violated by the court because he was not given jail credit pursuant to the terms of a plea agreement. We affirm the judgment of the habeas court.

On February 2, 2000, the petitioner pleaded guilty to possession of narcotics (narcotics case) in violation of General Statutes § 2 la-279 (a) and was sentenced to nine months incarceration. He subsequently was arrested and charged with robbery in the…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. State v. RosadoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2006
  3. State v. PerezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2004

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. CAEZ v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
  3. Caez v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API