Legal Opinion

State v. Perez

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided September 14, 2004No. AC 24417PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*29 Opinion

FOTI, J.

The defendant, Jeremiah Perez, appeals from the judgment of conviction of assault in the first degree in violation of General Statutes § 53a-59 (a) (5), rendered after the trial court accepted his plea of nolo contendere. On appeal, the defendant claims that the court improperly (1) accepted his plea and (2) concluded that it did not have jurisdiction to grant his postsentencing motion to withdraw his plea. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The record reflects that by substitute information, the state charged the defendant with the crimes of attempt to commit murder,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. State v. GarvinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  3. State v. WatsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  4. State v. SchaefferConnecticut Appellate Court · 1985
  5. State v. SilvaConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. DasSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
  2. State v. GonzalezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  3. Deutsche Bank National Trust Co. v. BertrandConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  4. Almedina v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2008
  5. State v. BrooksConnecticut Appellate Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API