Legal Opinion

McInturff v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 9, 1960PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice SwbpstoN

Before stating the question for solution, it is necessary to state the substance of this brief record. Lee Mclnturff, plaintiff in error hereinafter referred to as defendant, was convicted for possessing whisky and was ordered to pay a fine of $150 and costs. Thereupon he confessed judgment and secured his fine and costs with good sureties as provided by T.C.A. sec. 40-3202. Subsequently he moved for a new trial, which motion was overruled, an appeal was prayed and granted to the Supreme Court and an appearance bond given as provided in misdemeanor cases by T.C.A. sec. 40-3408..

Nothing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hooper v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Stanley v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Poteete v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1878
  4. Halfacre v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Hamilton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1878

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. TurnerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
  2. Ray v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Capri Adult Cinema v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1976
  4. State Ex Rel. Dillehay v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1966
  5. State v. LyonsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API