Legal Opinion

Halfacre v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM PUTNAM. Appeal in error from the Circuit Court of Putnam County. — W. T. Smith, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Neil

The plaintiff in error was convicted of a misdemeanor in the circuit court of Putnam county, and was fined one cent, and taxed with the costs of the cause. Thereupon he offered to secure such fine and costs, one of the attorneys of the court who was solvent, and good for the amount, expressing a willingness to become such surety, and. tendering himself with the plaintiff in error. The court declined to accept the attorney as surety, and, the plaintiff being unable to procure any one else, he was sentenced to the workhouse to work out the said fine and costs. Thereupon he appealed to this…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BradenCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1993
  2. State v. ButtreyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1988
  3. State v. BennettCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1990
  4. United States ex rel. Randolph v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1924
  5. McInturff v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API