Legal Opinion

Almadova v. Arnold

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 22, 1981No. 2 CA-CIV 4081PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BIRDSALL, Judge.

Petitioner has brought this special action to challenge the respondent court’s denial of his motion for a change of venue. Venue rulings are appropriately reviewable by special action. Haley v. Cochise County Hospital, 27 Ariz.App. 484, 556 P.2d 332 (1976); Campbell v. Deddens, 21 Ariz.App. 295, 518 P.2d 1012 (1974). Because we believe the respondent court abused its discretion, we assume jurisdiction and grant relief.

*116Petitioner is a defendant, along with the assistant director of the Arizona Department of Transportation, in a lawsuit filed by the real party in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Campbell v. DeddensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. Brown v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  3. Haley v. Cochise County HospitalCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Zuckernick v. RoylstonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Reilly v. SUPER. CT. IN & FOR MARICOPA CTY.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API