Legal Opinion

Zuckernick v. Roylston

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 22, 1984No. 2 CA-SA 0080PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Judge.

Petitioners have brought this special action to challenge the respondent court’s transfer of their lawsuit from Pima County to Maricopa County. Venue rulings are appropriately reviewable by special action. Almadova v. Arnold, 130 Ariz. 115, 634 P.2d 403 (App.1981); Haley v. Cochise County Hospital, 27 Ariz.App. 484, 556 P.2d 332 (1976). While it is true that appellate courts will not generally interfere with a venue ruling, Floyd v. Superior Court, 125 Ariz. 445, 610 P.2d 79 (1980), we believe the trial court exceeded its jurisdiction and therefore assume jurisdiction and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Massengill v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  2. Pride v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Campbell v. DeddensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  4. Brown v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  5. Ellsworth v. LaytonArizona Supreme Court · 1964

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Yarbrough v. Montoya-PaezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  2. Cacho v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Mohave County v. James R. Brathovde Family TrustCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  4. Cochise County v. BorowiecCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Lakritz v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API