Legal Opinion

Dorr v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 11, 1916PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from Circuit Court, Pocahontas County. Suit by C. P. Dorr against the Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Company. Decree for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

LyNCh, Judge:

By an original bill plaintiff prayed specific performance .of an alleged contract for an annual pass over an interstate railway during his life, in consideration of the grant of an easement in fee for a right of way over lands owned by him in Pocahontas County. By two amended bills, containing substantially the same averments, though with some slight additions, he prayed in the alternative for either specific performance or cancellation of the grant. The lower court denied *152specific performance, but .cancelled tbe deed and thereby restored the parties to their original status.

The…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Addyston Pipe & Steel Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. MottleySupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  3. Union Bridge Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
  4. Scranton v. WheelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  5. Lawrence v. GayettyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hill v. American Family Mutual InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Bell v. Kanawha Traction & Electric Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Campbell v. BauerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  4. Martin v. South Bluefield Land Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1917
  5. Morgan v. ThompsonNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API