Bay Area Roofers Health & Welfare Trust v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER(1) GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT(2) GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, United States District Judge
This ease involves interpretation of provisions of a stop-loss insurance policy issued by Defendant Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (“Sun Life”) regarding the scope of its contractual obligation to reimburse Plaintiff Bay Area Roofers Health and Welfare Trust (“the Trust”) for claims paid on behalf of a worker’s minor children for medical care. Sun Life asserts that coverage is precluded because *1157th…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- McKennan v. Meadowvale Dairy Emp. Benefit PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2019