Legal Opinion
Teter v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided November 17, 2005PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Senior Judge FLAHERTY.
Rebecca Teter (Claimant) petitions for review from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) granting Claimant’s claim petition for a limited time period. We affirm.
On July 27, 2000, Claimant alleges that she sustained a back injury while in the course and scope of her employment with Pinnacle Health System (Employer). Claimant filed a claim petition against Employer and its workers’ compensation carrier, Consolidated Risk Services (collectively, Respondents), seeking full…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Universal Cyclops Steel Corp. v. KrawczynskiCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Vinglinsky v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
- Innovative Spaces v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
- Cardyn v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Green v. Workers' Compensation Appeal Board (US Airways)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Jamison v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- City of Pittsburgh v. WCAB (Marinack)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- Hussey Copper, Ltd. and SWIF v. WCAB (Chiles)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017
- S. Jensen v. WCAB (Pleasant Valley Manor and PMA Mgmt. Corp.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.