Legal Opinion

Perisic v. Kim

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided October 24, 2019No. Civil Action No. 2018-2038Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MARIA PERISIC Plaintiff, No. 18-cv-2038 (EGS) v. JIM YONG KIM, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff Maria Perisic (“Ms. Perisic”), proceeding pro se, filed this action in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia (“Superior Court”) against four officials of the World Bank Group (“World Bank Defendants”) and Cigna (together with the World Bank Defendants, “Defendants”). The World Bank terminated Ms. Perisic because her position became redundant. She later challenged her termination through an internal review process.…

2Cases cited50 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API