Legal Opinion

In re Haney's Estate

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 6, 1893PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from surrogate’s court, Saratoga county. Final judicial settlement of the accounts of Sarah M. Byalls, as administratrix of the estate of William H. Byalls, as executor of the will of Elizabeth Haney, deceased. From the decree of the surrogate, Sarah M. Byalls appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtMayham, P. J.

Sarah M. Byalls, having been cited before the surrogate to show cause why she, as administratrix of the estate of *816William H. Ryalls, deceased, did not settle HIs accounts as executor of the will of Elizabeth Haney, deceased, appeared before the surrogate, and filed her petition for such accounting; whereupon the surrogate issued citations to the persons entitled to notice, and, on the return of such citations, she filed her account, duly verified, in and by which she charges herself, as such administratrix, with the sum of $935.58, and alleges want of knowledge of any other liability of the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Van Bokkelen v. . BerdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. In Re the Judicial Settlement by ClarkNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
  3. Furner v. . SeaburyNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re Shipman's EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  2. In re RyallsNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  3. In re RyallsNew York Supreme Court · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API