Legal Opinion
Image Technical Service, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided February 27, 1998No. 96-16014PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
Image Technical Service, Inc. and other companies (“Image Tech”) filed an antitrust suit against Eastman Kodak Co. (“Kodak”). Before trial, Kodak moved to disqualify Cou-dert Brothers, a law firm representing Image Tech, because the firm represented a division of Kodak in other matters. The district court disqualified Coudert from further representation of Image Tech. Image Tech eventually won the lawsuit. In this appeal, Kodak seeks to reverse a district court judgment that it must pay Image Tech $400,000 in statutory legal fees for Coudert’s representation.
FACTS
Image…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Eastman Kodak Co. v. Image Technical Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Flatt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
- Intel Corporation v. Terabyte International, Inc., Jean Hsu, Kenneth HsuCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Twin City Sportservice, Inc. v. Charles O. Finley & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Farmington Dowel Products Co. v. Forster Mfg. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1970
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Gilbrook v. City of WestminsterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- United States v. $186,416.00 in U.S. CurrencyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- 1998-1 Trade Cases P 72,067, 98 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 1405, 98 Daily Journal D.A.R. 1955 Image Technical Service, Inc. J-E-S-P Company, Inc. Shields Business MacHines Inc. Micrographic Services, Inc. Omni Micrographic Services, Inc. Atlanta General Microfilm Co., Inc Datek Ltd. B.C.S. Technical Services, Inc. Cpo Ltd., Inc. Advanced Systems Service, Inc. Amtech Equipment Maintenance, Inc. v. Eastman Kodak Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Paul Gilbrook Michael Garrison Don Herr Hal Raphael Dana Bowler Joe Wilson, Davis, Reno & Courtney, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Westminster Charles v. Smith Craig Schweisinger Tony Lam Don S. Anderson John T. Demonaco Brian Mayhew, Paul Gilbrook Michael Garrison Don Herr Hal Raphael Dana Bowler Westminster Fire Fighters Association, Local 2425 Joe Wilson International Association of Fire Fighters, Afl-Cio, Davis, Reno & Courtney, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Westminster Charles v. Smith Craig Schweisinger Tony Lam Don S. Anderson John T. Demonaco Brian Mayhew, Paul Gilbrook Michael Garrison Don Herr Hal Raphael Dana Bowler Westminster Fire Fighters Association, Local 2425 International Association of Fire Fighters, Afl-Cio Joe Wilson, Davis, Reno & Courtney, Plaintiff-Intervenor-Appellee v. City of Westminster Charles v. Smith Craig Schweisinger Tony Lam Don S. Anderson John T. Demonaco Brian MayhewCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.