State v. Anglo & London Paris Nat'l Bank of S.F.
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. Leib & Leib, Morrison, Dunne & Brobeek and R. B. Canfield for Appellants.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
This is an action by the state of California, begun in pursuance of the provisions of section 1273 of the Code of Civil Procedure, against the above-mentioned defendants and a large number of persons alleged to he depositors in said hanks to obtain a judgment against said banks, respectively, declaring that the credits of the depositors therein mentioned in the respective banks have es-cheated to the state of California, and directing the respective hanks to forthwith deposit the same with the state treasurer. Separate findings and a separate judgment were given and entered in the case with…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- National Bank v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Guthrie v. HarknessSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- McClellan v. ChipmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Waite v. DowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1877
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- First National Bank of San Jose v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Anderson Nat. Bank v. ReevesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1942
- State v. San Francisco Savings & Loan SocietyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- National Bank of Commerce v. State Ex Rel. GarrisonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1962
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.