Legal Opinion
Anderson Nat. Bank v. Reeves
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided December 18, 1942PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Fulton
Affirming in part and reversing in part.
This appeal brings in question the correctness of a judgment holding valid certain parts of Chap. 79 of the Acts of 1940 (KRS 393.010 et seq.), as amended by-Chap. 156 of the Acts of 1942, dealing with escheats and with the disposition of certain classes of property declared to he presumed abandoned. By the cross appeal it is sought to reverse the judgment in so far as it adjudged certain portions of the same Acts invalid.
By sections 3 to 6 of the Act inclusive (KRS sections 393.020, 393.030, 393.040 and 393.050)…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Burnet v. Sanford & Brooks Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Davis v. Elmira Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Security Savings Bank v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- McClellan v. ChipmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- First National Bank of San Jose v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Anderson National Bank v. LuckettSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- State v. Northwestern National Bank of MinneapolisSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
- State v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
- American Express Travel Related Services, Inc. v. KentuckyDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2009
- Union Trust Co. of Pittsburgh CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.