Legal Opinion

United States v. Ezell

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 2006No. CRIM.A.02-815PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

DUBOIS, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

On December 17, 2002, a federal grand jury sitting in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania returned a twelve count Indictment charging Mr. Jamal Ezell with interference with commerce by robbery, in violation of the Hobbs Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1951, and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2 (Counts 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, and 11), and carrying and using a firearm during a crime of violence and aiding and abetting in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 924(c) and (2) (Counts 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12). The charges arise out of six robberies in and around…

2Cases cited46 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. United States v. BookerSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  4. Solem v. HelmSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Harmelin v. MichiganSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  2. United States v. CiszkowskiDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2006
  3. United States v. RobersonDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2008
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014
  5. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API