Legal Opinion

Fite v. Friends of Mayflower, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arkansas

Decided January 9, 1985No. CA 84-118PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Tom Glaze, Judge.

This appeal arises from the chancery court’s denial of appellant’s specific performance suit against appellee, the Friends of Mayflower, Inc. (FOM). Appellant alleged FOM breached its agreement to sell appellant a building for $65,000. The court held the agreement unenforceable because the parties had “no meeting of the minds” concerning the contractual terms. We reverse the decision of the lower court because it erroneously refused appellant’s request to exclude witnesses from the courtroom.

Immediately before trial, FOM requested that its shareholders be permitted to stay in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Chambers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. International Harvester Corp. v. HardinSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  3. Morton v. WileySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Clark v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  2. Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
  3. Dillard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1987
  4. King v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  5. Anthony v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API