Legal Opinion

International Harvester Corp. v. Hardin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided December 18, 1978No. 78-148PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

In 1968 W. R. Moore purchased a model 125 Cub Cadet garden tractor with a 42 inch mower attachment. The garden tractor, powered by a 12 horsepower engine, was hydrostatically operated — i.e. through the use of hydraulic controls the speed of the tractor either forward or backward could be increased or decreased without varying the speed of the 12 horsepower gasoline engine. Although the tractor was designed for use with a number of attachments, such as a snow plow, front-end loader and a rotary tiller, Mr. Moore only used it as a riding lawn mower. On October 5, 1974, Mr.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. McCoy Farms, Inc. v. J & M McKEESupreme Court of Arkansas · 1978
  2. South Austin Drive-In Theatre v. ThomisonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1967
  3. Rushton v. First National Bank of MagnoliaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Nerud v. Haybuster Manufacturing, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Wallin v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Scott Crawford and Darlene Crawford v. Sears Roebuck & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
  4. Arkansas Power & Light Co. v. MelkovitzCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
  5. Fite v. Friends of Mayflower, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arkansas · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API