Legal Opinion
In re the Accounting of Katz
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 7, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMatthew M. Levy, J.
Two proposed final orders were submitted in these proceedings — one by the respondents Katz, Gold and Schimmel, another by the petitioners Ammond and Maguire. These orders were duly settled on notice to all parties. On May 4, 1962, I rejected the latter proposed order; and, after making some corrections and substantial changes in the former, I signed and caused it to be duly filed on that date.
Among the changes I made in the order which I signed, I struck therefrom certain proposed provisions for allowances to counsel and added the following: “ ordered, that the matter of the fixation of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Otis Elevator Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Berkson v. SchneidermanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- In re the Transfer Tax upon the Estate of SeymourAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
- Morris v. Chemical Bank Trust CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- In re WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1894
3Cited by2 opinions
- Millner v. MillnerNew York Supreme Court · 1969
- In re the Intermediate Accounting of Irving Trust Co.New York Supreme Court · 1963