State v. S.G.
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Jim Hannah, Chief Justice.
The State of Arkansas brings an interlocutory appeal under Ark. R. Crim. P. 3 seeking review of a decision of the Pulaski County Circuit Court, Juvenile Division, suppressing S.G.’s custodial statement. We hold that the appeal fails to comply with Rule 3. The State’s interlocutory appeal is dismissed. Our jurisdiction is pursuant to Ark. Sup. Ct. R. 1-2 (b)(1).
At a hearing to determine whether S.G.’s alleged misconduct should be handled under Extended Juvenile Jurisdiction,1 the State attempted to introduce S.G.’s custodial statement. S.G. objected, asserting that…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. HartSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2005
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008
- State of Arkansas v. Lee Earnest Clarks, 2ndSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- State of Arkansas v. Lee Earnest Clarks, 2ndSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024
- State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2019
- State of Arkansas v. Matthew KirchnerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.