Legal Opinion

Murphy v. Copeland

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 6, 1882PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Buchanan Circuit Court. . Action to recover land. The cause was tried to the court without a jury, and judgment rendered for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.

I. This cause has before been in this court: See 51 Iowa, 515.

The Circuit Court made a finding of facts and announced the conclusion of law upon which the decision is based. The correctness of the finding of facts is not disputed. As it briefly and clearly states the facts of ’the case we here present it, with the conclusion of law announced by the court.

“1st. The court finds, as a matter of fact, that the plaintiff is the owner of the following described premises: ‘Commencing at the point where Pine Creek crosses the section line between sections 4 and 9, township 88, range 8, Buchanan…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Halsey v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  2. Halsey v. . McCormickNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  3. Cook v. . McClureNew York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Murphy v. CopelandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1879

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Noyes v. CollinsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  2. Allen v. WeberWisconsin Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Amoco Oil Co. v. State Highway DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Holmes v. HainesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
  5. Kerr v. FeeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API