Legal Opinion

Marinack v. Blackburn

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided April 17, 1923PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MlLLER, PRESIDENT:

Upon alleged principles of equity plaintiffs by their bill sought to impress with and have charged as a lien upon Lots Nos. 1 and 2 in Block 43 of the City of Williamson, the sum *587of $645.00, which they were obliged to pay to the "Williamson Mining and Manufacturing Company as the balance of purchase money and accrued interest due it from the late 6. R. Blackburn upon Lot No. 8 in Block 42 of said city, and for which balance the. said grantor in its deed to said Blackburn, dated July 2, 1903, retained a vendor’s lien.

The bases of plaintiffs’ claim to the relief prayed for are…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crumlish's Adm'r v. Cent. Imp. Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Neely v. JonesWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Depue v. MillerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Smith v. WhiteWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1913
  5. Williamson v. ClineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dunn v. RockwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Camden v. Fink Coal & Coke Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Dunn v. RockwellWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Taylor v. TurnerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API