Legal Opinion
Glenn v. McCarty
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided September 24, 1934No. 4353PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JACKSON, Justice.
Tbis suit was instituted by A. V. McCarty, Jr., adjudged to be insane, acting by bis wife, Dora McCarty, wbo is bis duly appointed guardian. He sought the cancellation of a lien held by the Temple Trust Company against lot 6 in block 12 in the town of Muleshoe, Bailey county, Tex., and alleged that the debt secured by such lien was usurious, and, if the payments he had made were credited on the principal, such debt would be discharged.
A. V. McCarty, Sr., and his wife, Kate McCarty. were also plaintiffs and asked to be discharged from all liability on said debt
The Temple Trust…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Temple Trust Co. v. StobaughCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Davis v. . GarrNew York Court of Appeals · 1851
- Moore v. Temple Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1933
- Faison v. Grandy.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
- Richardson v. FosterWashington Supreme Court · 1918
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Glenn v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1937
- Glenn v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
- Glenn v. McCartyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1939
- Glenn v. McCartyTexas Supreme Court · 1941
- Glenn v. McCartyTexas Commission of Appeals · 1941
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.