Legal Opinion

Heyman v. Hanauer

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1930No. Appeal, 189PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

On April 3, 1925, defendant sold and assigned to Joseph Steinman his entire interest in a business owned and conducted by him under the name of Hamburger Distillery, Ltd., together with from 25,000 to 30,000 cases of whiskey then in storage. By separate writing bearing the same date, Steinman agreed to liquidate the business and return to defendant one half the net proceeds received and retain the other half in payment for his services. Later, defendant desired to be relieved from the contract, and, with assistance of plaintiff, Steinman was induced to accept a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Truby v. SeybertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1849
  2. Greenawalt v. McEnelleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  3. Rabinowitz v. SilvermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
  4. Wolf v. StudebakerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Bascom v. Danville Stove & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1897

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Rochester MacHine Corp. v. Mulach Steel Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Cooper v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  3. John E. Smith's Sons Co. v. Lattimer Foundry & Machine Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1956
  4. Cooper's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  5. Theckla B. Webb v. Lloyd K. Martin, Administrator of the Estate of Jason A. Martin, Deceased, and Third-Party v. Carl C. Stalcup, Third-PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1966

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API