Bednarsh v. Winshall
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtDethmers, C. J.
Defendant appeals from denial of his motion to set aside a default judgment against him in the amount of $11,385.
The judgment was based on a claim for money due in assumpsit. The motion was supported by an affidavit of merits alleging payment, with canceled •checks attached as supporting evidence. We think a good showing of a meritorious defense was made,, if the affidavit be true. Counteraffidavits were filed to the effect that the payments to plaintiff were not from defendant and were on another account. A serious question of fact was thus presented as to-whether defendant did or did not…
2Cited by8 opinions
- Alken-Ziegler, Inc. v. Waterbury Headers Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Muntean v. City of DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1985
- Freeman v. RemleyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- Bednarsh v. WinshallMichigan Supreme Court · 1965
- Daugherty v. StateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.