Kiel Wooden Ware Co. v. Laun
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.
The action is on a promissory note. The defendant demurred ore tenus to the complaint on the ground that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The court sustained the demurrer.
The note sued upon is set out as part of the complaint. It is in form a negotiable note by its terms payable to the order of the corporation-maker' Kiel Furniture Company. It appears from the complaint that the corporation-maker did not indorse the note, but it bears the indorsement of two individuals connected with the corporation-maker, one, the defendant J.- B. Laun, the president and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Cassetta v. BaimaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Houghton v. ElyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1870
- Continental National Bank of Chicago v. McGeochWisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
- Achee v. WilliamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1927
- Armato v. RossLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Kiel Wooden Ware Co. v. RaederWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942