Legal Opinion

Eifert v. Bush

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 19, 1966PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBernard S. Meyer, J.

This motion for reargument is denied (see 51 Misc 2d 248). With respect to the homicide investigation report, the order directs that it be produced together with an official having knowledge of the departmental procedures involved so that plaintiff can by examining the official ascertain whether to seek inspection or discovery. The county erroneously assumes that disclosure has been ordered; what has in fact been ordered is the preliminary procedure suggested in Rios v. Donovan (21 A D 2d 409). The suggestion that plaintiff cannot proceed by motion and must seek relief in an article 78…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Costich v. City of RochesterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902
  2. Eifert v. BushNew York Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Nephew v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1942
  4. McCandless v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1956

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Eifert v. BushAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
  2. Hayes v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1975
  3. Michigan Mutual Liability Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API